Monday, October 17, 2016

Voting Rights


In the divisive, caustic political climate in which we live, you may find yourself saying, “How could they possibly vote for ____?” We all do this, and we mean it! We cannot see how anyone could vote for someone other than the one we have chosen. We have convinced ourselves that it is a simple decision, but it really isn’t. It’s complex and it involves several factors. I have identified a few of them that I’d like you to think about before you decide that your friends are just plain crazy if they don’t agree with you.

First of all, before we even know who’s running for office, most of us consider ourselves a part of one political party. Even if we aren’t loyal to one party in every election, we assume that we’ll vote for a certain party candidate. Some people find it very difficult to vote for a candidate that isn’t in their party. Since my dad changed parties when I was in high school, I learned as a teenager to look at more than just party loyalty. I generally begin by listening to all candidates to see how their views of governing at the local, state, or federal level line up with mine. Since I know many of the candidates at the local level, my decisions don’t usually have much to do with party affiliation. At the state and federal levels, I always look at party affiliation, but I look at other factors before making a decision because I believe that we all want many of the same things. We just disagree on how to achieve them.

Second, we tend to choose candidates whose personalities are attractive to us. But that isn’t the same for all of us. Just as we choose friends based on their personalities, we may like or dislike a political candidate because he/she exhibits certain characteristics. For example, I generally like positive people, people who seem to be optimistic about the future. Negative, complaining people are a turnoff to me even if I agree with them on some issues.

Third, most of us think of the character of the candidate. Because most politicians have character flaws, we tend to pick and choose the flaws that are “deal breakers” for us. This is a major problem in this election, because the candidates do so much name calling and accusing one another without citing any specifics. If what is said about a candidate concerns me, I do a lot of fact checking to see if it seems to be a real fact or just a twisted bit of information to suit the opponent. One day, just as an experiment, I took two accusations about each of the presidential candidates and did some fact checking. I learned that of the four accusations, none of them were actually true. They were perversions of something they had done, but not really reliable accusations. I also try to look at the individual’s record over the long haul. Is it a pattern of behavior supported by several incidents? Does it in any way align with what I’ve heard the candidate say?

The fourth factor is personal impact. In a general way, we all believe that the results of a presidential election will impact our lives, but if we believe it will impact us in a specific way, this factor may override all the others. Even if what a candidate will do will help most of the people in the country, if it impacts us negatively, we may vote against that candidate. I think we should strive to look at the big picture in national elections, but that’s often difficult to do.

Finally, there are the issues. We all have issues that are important to us--education, defense, immigration, healthcare, equal rights, etc.  I want to say a word about money here. Often our political discussions revolve around how the government spends money or how much our taxes will be. Money seems to be our god. Our decisions should never be all about money though. They should include things like how a candidate seems to value people and treat people. Part of that will of course include how money is spent, but a candidate’s compassion for others and his/her concern for the welfare of all people should be at the core of decisions about governing.

Ideally, we should be able to say that our candidate aligns with our political views, has a personality we like, is of good character, makes decisions that impact us in a positive way, and agrees with us all the issues. This is usually not the case. As we look at our choices and our friend’s choices, let us realize that our perspectives are different from theirs and give them the freedom to choose without our judgment.

.